VERS vs VOO
ProShares Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, VERS or VOO?
Single Currency against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VERS led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VERS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 41 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +17.34%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +19.90%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.56%Best | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.8% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $17,360 | $18,435Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Single Currency | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 15, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 17, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.5 years).
VERS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
VERS vs VOO Performance
ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VERS returned +19.90% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, VERS is up 17.34% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, VERS compounded at +27.56% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VERS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.8% compared with 15.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for VERS and -22.1% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VERS charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VERS currently yields 0.13% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
39.6% of VERS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 31.3% of VOO's money is in holdings VERS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in VERS and 494 in VOO, against full books of 41 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 475 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for VERS (67.8% of the fund), and 24 for VERS that do not appear in VOO (56.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VERS | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.64% | 7.55% | 2.91% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.76% | 7.05% | 2.29% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.77% | 5.36% | 0.59% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.45% | 4.13% | 0.32% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.50% | 3.24% | 1.26% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.55% | 1.90% | 2.65% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.99% | 1.44% | 1.55% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 4.14% | 0.28% | 3.86% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.61% | 0.24% | 2.37% |
| COHRCoherent Corp | 1.05% | 0.08% | 0.97% |
39.6% of VERS is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VERS or VOO?
VERS has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VERS or VOO?
Over the past year VERS returned +19.90% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VERS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VERS or VOO?
VERS has been the more volatile fund at 30.8% annualized versus 15.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VERS -42.1% vs VOO -22.1%.
Should I hold both VERS and VOO?
VERS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VERS and VOO?
39.6% of VERS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 31.3% of VOO's is in holdings VERS also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in VERS and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, VERS or VOO?
VERS yields 0.13% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than VERS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VERS led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.