VONG vs VTILX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund Class Institutional
Quick Verdict
VONG has a lower expense ratio. VONG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTILX offers more diversification with 7,391 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VONG | VTILX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% | |
| AUM | $51.6B | $141.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 4.19% | |
| Holdings | 373 | 7,391 | |
| YTD Return | +4.01% | -1.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.19% | -3.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.47% | -0.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 6.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -15.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2010 | Feb 17, 2021 |
VONG vs VTILX Performance
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund Class Institutional (VTILX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VONG returned +12.19% while VTILX returned -3.21%. Year to date, VONG is up 4.01% versus a loss of 1.38% for VTILX.
Over three years, VONG compounded at +22.47% per year against -0.30% for VTILX. Across the full 5-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.63% annualized vs -2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VONG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 6.0% for VTILX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for VONG and -15.3% for VTILX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VONG charges 0.06% per year while VTILX charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $7 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VONG currently yields 0.48% against 4.19% for VTILX.
Holdings Overlap
VONG and VTILX share 6 holdings out of 1824 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VONG or VTILX?
VONG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTILX charges 0.07%. VONG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VONG or VTILX?
Over the past year VONG returned +12.19% vs -3.21% for VTILX, so VONG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VONG annualized +15.63% vs -2.89% for VTILX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VONG or VTILX?
VONG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 6.0% for VTILX. Worst drawdown: VONG -32.7% vs VTILX -15.3%.
Should I hold both VONG and VTILX?
VONG and VTILX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VONG and VTILX?
VONG and VTILX share 6 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1824 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VONG or VTILX?
VONG yields 0.48% while VTILX yields 4.19%, so VTILX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular Fund Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.