VOO vs WLTG
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. WLTG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WLTG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.74% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $79M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.15% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 37 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | +12.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +23.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +23.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -25.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WealthTrust Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Dec 6, 2021 |
VOO vs WLTG Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is a ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% while WLTG returned +23.39%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.48% versus a gain of 12.16% for WLTG.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.80% per year against +23.49% for WLTG. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 13.8% for WLTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -25.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 4.15% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and WLTG share 25 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WLTG?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WLTG charges 0.74%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WLTG?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% vs +23.39% for WLTG, so WLTG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VOO annualized +13.61% vs +11.06% for WLTG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WLTG?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 13.8% for WLTG. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WLTG -25.1%.
Should I hold both VOO and WLTG?
VOO and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WLTG?
VOO and WLTG share 25 common holdings with a 21.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WLTG?
VOO yields 1.09% while WLTG yields 4.15%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.