VOO vs XDAT
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin Exponential Data ETF
Which is better, VOO or XDAT?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 509 | 61 |
| YTD Return | +12.37%Best | +6.54% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -4.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.37%Best | +13.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.49%Best | -0.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 24.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -54.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,827Best | $9,645 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6%Best | 57.3% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 12, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.7 years).
VOO vs XDAT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
VOO vs XDAT Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year VOO returned +16.61% while XDAT returned -4.82%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.37% versus a gain of 6.54% for XDAT.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.37% per year against +13.73% for XDAT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.49% and -0.72% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.72% annualized vs +1.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XDAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for VOO and -54.9% for XDAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XDAT charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.00% for XDAT.
Holdings Overlap
15.3% of VOO's money is in holdings XDAT also owns. 57.0% of XDAT's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
29 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 61 in XDAT, against full books of 509 and 61.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 26 positions for XDAT that do not appear in our book for VOO (39.2% of the fund), and 458 for VOO that do not appear in XDAT (83.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in XDAT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.24% | 8.45% | 5.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 4.41% | 0.95% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 5.96% | 4.06% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.30% | 4.84% | 4.54% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.42% | 4.63% | 4.21% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.14% | 3.41% | 3.27% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.44% | 2.75% | 2.31% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 0.17% | 2.77% | 2.60% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.34% | 2.45% | 2.11% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.29% | 2.40% | 2.11% |
57.0% of XDAT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XDAT?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XDAT charges 0.50%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or XDAT?
Over the past year VOO returned +16.61% vs -4.82% for XDAT, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), VOO annualized +14.72% vs +1.55% for XDAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOO or XDAT?
XDAT has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -24.5% vs XDAT -54.9%.
Should I hold both VOO and XDAT?
VOO and XDAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XDAT?
57.0% of XDAT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 57.0% of XDAT's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 61 in XDAT.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XDAT?
VOO yields 1.04% while XDAT yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XDAT better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.