VOTE vs VTI
TCW Transform 500 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, VOTE or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VOTE led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOTE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 509 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.67%Best | +11.53% |
| 1Y Return | +15.88%Best | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.19%Best | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.26%Best | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8%Tie | 15.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -25.7% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,829Best | $17,303 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2021 to Sep 15, 2026 (5.2 years).
VOTE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
VOTE vs VTI Performance
TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) is an ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOTE returned +15.88% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, VOTE is up 11.67% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Over three years, VOTE compounded at +21.19% per year against +20.67% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.26% and +11.59% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOTE and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.7% for VOTE and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOTE charges 0.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOTE currently yields 0.92% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.9% of VOTE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.8% of VTI's money is in holdings VOTE also owns.
Most of VOTE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
488 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in VOTE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 509 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 676 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for VOTE (9.1% of the fund), and 5 for VOTE that do not appear in VTI (0.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOTE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.82% | 6.40% | 1.42% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.65% | 6.29% | 0.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.45% | 4.79% | 0.66% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.82% | 3.65% | 0.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 2.90% | 0.10% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.71% | 2.56% | 0.15% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.40% | 2.31% | 0.09% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.91% | 1.70% | 0.21% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.29% | 0.33% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.45% | 1.31% | 0.14% |
98.9% of VOTE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOTE or VTI?
VOTE has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOTE or VTI?
Over the past year VOTE returned +15.88% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VOTE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOTE or VTI?
VOTE and VTI have been equally volatile, both at 15.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: VOTE -25.7% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both VOTE and VTI?
VOTE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOTE and VTI?
98.9% of VOTE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.8% of VTI's is in holdings VOTE also owns. They hold 488 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in VOTE and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOTE or VTI?
VOTE yields 0.92% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than VOTE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VOTE led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.