VPX vs VYM

VPX vs VYM

Which is better, VPX or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVPXVYM
Expense Ratio0.75%0.04%Best
AUM$55M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings125613
YTD Return+28.63%Best+10.24%
1Y Return-+14.89%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.00%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.42%
Top 10 Weight40.2%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyVariant Perception, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 11, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VPX vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VPX vs VYM Performance

Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF (VPX) is an ETF from Variant Perception, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, VPX is up 28.63% versus a gain of 10.24% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VPX charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VPX currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

VPX already in VYM46.7%
VYM already in VPX50.6%

46.7% of VPX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 50.6% of VYM's money is in holdings VPX also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

68 positions in common, counted across the 127 positions we hold weights for in VPX and 557 in VYM, against full books of 125 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 461 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for VPX (46.7% of the fund), and 56 for VPX that do not appear in VYM (51.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VPXWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.99%7.35%2.36%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.05%3.82%0.77%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.3.63%2.63%1.00%
CVXChevron Corp2.58%1.48%1.10%
BACBank Of America Corp.2.30%1.66%0.64%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common0.86%2.51%1.65%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.1.28%1.50%0.22%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.1.22%1.07%0.15%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares0.37%1.86%1.49%
CCitigroup Inc.1.21%0.89%0.32%

50.6% of VYM is already inside VPX.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VPXVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VPX or VYM?

VPX has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VPX and VYM?

50.6% of VYM's money is in holdings VPX also owns. 50.6% of VYM's is in holdings VPX also owns. They hold 68 positions in common, counted across the 127 positions we hold weights for in VPX and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, VPX or VYM?

VPX yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than VPX?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.