VTI vs WLTG
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Which is better, VTI or WLTG?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window, WLTG over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $690.1B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 4.00% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +14.14%Best | +9.77% |
| 1Y Return | +16.22%Best | +13.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.93% | +23.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -25.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $17,008Best | $15,953 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 44.2% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WealthTrust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 6, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2021 to Oct 5, 2026 (4.8 years).
VTI vs WLTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WLTG Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is an ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year VTI returned +16.22% while WLTG returned +13.73%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.14% versus a gain of 9.77% for WLTG.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +22.93% per year against +23.93% for WLTG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 13.6% for WLTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for VTI and -25.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 4.00% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
34.0% of VTI's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 65.5% of WLTG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, VTI as of Jul 31, 2026 and WLTG as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
34 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 43 in WLTG, against full books of 3,524 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for WLTG that do not appear in our book for VTI (30.5% of the fund), and 1,117 for VTI that do not appear in WLTG (63.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in WLTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.40% | 3.87% | 2.53% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.29% | 1.62% | 4.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.79% | 1.91% | 2.88% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.65% | 2.92% | 0.73% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.90% | 2.30% | 0.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.70% | 3.36% | 1.66% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.35% | 3.36% | 2.01% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.56% | 1.90% | 0.66% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.29% | 2.46% | 1.17% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 0.15% | 3.18% | 3.03% |
65.5% of WLTG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WLTG?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WLTG charges 0.74%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WLTG?
Over the past year VTI returned +16.22% vs +13.73% for WLTG, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WLTG?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 13.6% for WLTG. Worst drawdown: VTI -25.4% vs WLTG -25.1%.
Should I hold both VTI and WLTG?
VTI and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WLTG?
65.5% of WLTG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 65.5% of WLTG's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 43 in WLTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WLTG?
VTI yields 1.03% while WLTG yields 4.00%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLTG better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window, WLTG over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.