VTI vs WUGI
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
Which is better, VTI or WUGI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and 5Y, WUGI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WUGI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.84% |
| AUM | $690.1B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 0.24% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 35 |
| YTD Return | +13.35% | +27.45%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.92%Best | +2.18% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.41% | +30.34%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.83%Best | +11.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1%Best | 28.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4%Best | -56.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,286Best | $17,435 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 58.0% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | AXS Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Mar 31, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 31, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.5 years).
VTI vs WUGI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.5 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WUGI Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) is an ETF from AXS Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% while WUGI returned +2.18%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.35% versus a gain of 27.45% for WUGI.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +23.41% per year against +30.34% for WUGI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.83% and +11.76% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, WUGI has the edge at +22.52% annualized vs +19.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WUGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.6% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for VTI and -56.4% for WUGI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WUGI charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $84 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.24% for WUGI.
Holdings Overlap
22.3% of VTI's money is in holdings WUGI also owns. 80.8% of WUGI's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of WUGI is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
26 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 31 in WUGI, against full books of 3,524 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for WUGI that do not appear in our book for VTI (2.8% of the fund), and 1,125 for VTI that do not appear in WUGI (75.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in WUGI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.40% | 5.89% | 0.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.65% | 5.45% | 1.80% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.29% | 6.85% | 5.56% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.31% | 4.58% | 2.27% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.56% | 4.16% | 1.60% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.08% | 5.45% | 4.37% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.56% | 5.76% | 5.20% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.23% | 5.18% | 4.95% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.50% | 4.14% | 3.64% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.25% | 3.64% | 3.39% |
80.8% of WUGI is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WUGI?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WUGI charges 0.84%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WUGI?
Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% vs +2.18% for WUGI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VTI annualized +19.42% vs +22.52% for WUGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WUGI?
WUGI has been the more volatile fund at 28.6% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -25.4% vs WUGI -56.4%.
Should I hold both VTI and WUGI?
VTI and WUGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WUGI?
80.8% of WUGI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 80.8% of WUGI's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 31 in WUGI.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WUGI?
VTI yields 1.03% while WUGI yields 0.24%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WUGI better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and 5Y, WUGI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.