VOO vs ZAP
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | ZAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $475M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +7.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | +15.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -11.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Dec 17, 2024 |
VOO vs ZAP Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while ZAP returned +15.06%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a gain of 7.63% for ZAP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -11.9% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 1.67% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and ZAP share 23 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or ZAP?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZAP charges 0.50%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or ZAP?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs +15.06% for ZAP, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs +20.62% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs ZAP -11.9%.
Should I hold both VOO and ZAP?
VOO and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and ZAP?
VOO and ZAP share 23 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZAP?
VOO yields 1.08% while ZAP yields 1.67%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.