VTI vs ZAP
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | ZAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $475M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +14.82% | +12.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.43% | +19.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.93% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 14.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -11.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 17, 2024 |
VTI vs ZAP Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year VTI returned +22.43% while ZAP returned +19.30%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.82% versus a gain of 12.91% for ZAP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.9% for ZAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -11.9% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 1.67% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and ZAP share 35 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or ZAP?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZAP charges 0.50%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or ZAP?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.43% vs +19.30% for ZAP, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VTI annualized +8.16% vs +24.43% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or ZAP?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.9% for ZAP. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs ZAP -11.9%.
Should I hold both VTI and ZAP?
VTI and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and ZAP?
VTI and ZAP share 35 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZAP?
VTI yields 1.07% while ZAP yields 1.67%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.