VTI vs ZAP
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, VTI or ZAP?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $453M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +12.57%Best | +8.38% |
| 1Y Return | +17.22%Best | +13.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.87% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.86% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -11.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,173 | $13,701Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
VTI vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
VTI vs ZAP Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year VTI returned +17.22% while ZAP returned +13.82%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.57% versus a gain of 8.38% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for VTI and -11.9% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
At least 86.0% of ZAP's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of ZAP is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
35 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 3,543 and 47.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in ZAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PWRQuanta Services, Inc. | 0.15% | 4.68% | 4.53% |
| ETNEaton Corp. Plc | 0.23% | 4.45% | 4.22% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.08% | 4.53% | 4.45% |
| BEBloom Energy Corporation Com Cl A | 0.11% | 4.46% | 4.35% |
| AMEAmetek Inc. | 0.08% | 4.37% | 4.29% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 0.15% | 4.01% | 3.86% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 0.25% | 3.87% | 3.62% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 0.14% | 3.96% | 3.82% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc. | 0.06% | 4.01% | 3.95% |
| EXCExelon Corp. | 0.07% | 3.98% | 3.91% |
86.0% of ZAP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or ZAP?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZAP charges 0.50%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or ZAP?
Over the past year VTI returned +17.22% vs +13.82% for ZAP, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VTI annualized +17.60% vs +20.35% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -19.3% vs ZAP -11.9%.
Should I hold both VTI and ZAP?
VTI and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and ZAP?
At least 86.0% of ZAP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZAP?
VTI yields 1.03% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.