AOD vs ELCV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Eventide High Dividend ETF
Which is better, AOD or ELCV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y and the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | ELCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $268M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 2.14% |
| Holdings | 86 | 46 |
| YTD Return | +15.67% | +15.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.28%Best | +17.67% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.77% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.58% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -18.4% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,726Best | $12,724 |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.5%Best | 39.8% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Eventide |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 30, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 23, 2026 (2 years).
AOD vs ELCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
AOD vs ELCV Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) is an ETF from Eventide. Over the past year AOD returned +23.28% while ELCV returned +17.67%. Year to date, AOD is up 15.67% versus a gain of 15.85% for ELCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 13.7% for ELCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for AOD and -18.4% for ELCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while ELCV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $49 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 2.14% for ELCV.
Holdings Overlap
18.8% of AOD's money is in holdings ELCV also owns. 20.5% of ELCV's money is in holdings AOD also owns.
ELCV and AOD share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 49 in ELCV, against full books of 86 and 46.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 34 positions for ELCV that do not appear in our book for AOD (70.2% of the fund), and 37 for AOD that do not appear in ELCV (43.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in ELCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 1.34% | 4.51% | 3.17% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 3.80% | 1.99% | 1.81% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.48% | 1.01% | 2.47% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.88% | 3.34% | 2.46% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.54% | 0.98% | 1.56% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.30% | 1.63% | 0.33% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.91% | 1.99% | 1.08% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.03% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 1.09% | 1.55% | 0.46% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 1.18% | 1.17% | 0.01% |
20.5% of ELCV is already inside AOD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or ELCV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while ELCV charges 0.49%. ELCV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or ELCV?
Over the past year AOD returned +23.28% vs +17.67% for ELCV, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOD annualized +21.35% vs +12.80% for ELCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or ELCV?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 13.7% for ELCV. Worst drawdown: AOD -16.7% vs ELCV -18.4%.
Should I hold both AOD and ELCV?
AOD and ELCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and ELCV?
20.5% of ELCV's money is in holdings AOD also owns. 20.5% of ELCV's is in holdings AOD also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 49 in ELCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or ELCV?
AOD yields 11.73% while ELCV yields 2.14%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ELCV better than AOD?
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y and the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.