AAUB vs VTI

AAUB vs VTI

Which is better, AAUB or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAAUBVTI
Expense Ratio0.10%0.03%Best
AUM$840M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings1,4083,543
YTD Return+5.07%+14.00%Best
1Y Return-+16.88%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.75%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.68%
Top 10 Weight35.3%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyAlpha ArchitectVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 23, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AAUB vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AAUB vs VTI Performance

Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETF (AAUB) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AAUB is up 5.07% versus a gain of 14.00% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AAUB charges 0.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AAUB currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

AAUB already in VTI82.7%
VTI already in AAUB81.3%

82.7% of AAUB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 81.3% of VTI's money is in holdings AAUB also owns.

Most of AAUB is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

361 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in AAUB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,408 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 804 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AAUB (16.3% of the fund), and 106 for AAUB that do not appear in VTI (14.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AAUBWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.95%6.40%0.55%
AAPLApple, Inc6.58%6.29%0.29%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.57%4.79%0.22%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.93%3.65%0.72%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.80%2.90%0.10%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.02%2.56%0.46%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.27%2.31%1.04%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.67%1.70%0.03%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc2.03%1.08%0.95%
ROIV:BMRoivant Sciences Ltd. Common Shares2.70%0.02%2.68%

82.7% of AAUB is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AAUBVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AAUB or VTI?

AAUB has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AAUB and VTI?

82.7% of AAUB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 81.3% of VTI's is in holdings AAUB also owns. They hold 361 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in AAUB and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, AAUB or VTI?

AAUB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than AAUB?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.