ABLD vs CAPE
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
Which is better, ABLD or CAPE?
Each has led over a different period.
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over 1Y and the full window, CAPE over 3Y. CAPE is less concentrated, with 28.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | CAPE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $99M | $216M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.37% |
| Holdings | 51 | 182 |
| YTD Return | +8.91%Best | +0.21% |
| 1Y Return | +13.49%Best | +1.89% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.55% | +11.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -22.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $14,664Best | $13,411 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 28.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | DoubleLine Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Mar 31, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 5, 2022 to Oct 13, 2026 (4.5 years).
ABLD vs CAPE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs CAPE Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (CAPE) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds. Over the past year ABLD returned +13.49% while CAPE returned +1.89%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.91% versus a gain of 0.21% for CAPE.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.55% per year against +11.61% for CAPE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.7% for CAPE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -22.1% for CAPE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while CAPE charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $65 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.37% for CAPE.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of ABLD's money is in holdings CAPE also owns. 1.2% of CAPE's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and CAPE share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, ABLD as of Sep 15, 2026 and CAPE as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 171 in CAPE, against full books of 51 and 182.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 161 positions for CAPE that do not appear in our book for ABLD (93.4% of the fund), and 31 for ABLD that do not appear in CAPE (64.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABLD | Weight in CAPE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 3.43% | 1.21% | 2.22% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and CAPE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or CAPE?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while CAPE charges 0.65%. ABLD is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or CAPE?
Over the past year ABLD returned +13.49% vs +1.89% for CAPE, so ABLD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or CAPE?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.7% for CAPE. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs CAPE -22.1%.
Should I hold both ABLD and CAPE?
ABLD and CAPE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and CAPE?
3.4% of ABLD's money is in holdings CAPE also owns. 1.2% of CAPE's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 171 in CAPE.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or CAPE?
ABLD yields 3.37% while CAPE yields 1.37%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CAPE better than ABLD?
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over 1Y and the full window, CAPE over 3Y. CAPE is less concentrated, with 28.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.