ABLD vs FDIV
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF
Which is better, ABLD or FDIV?
ABLD has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | FDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $99M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 51 | 224 |
| YTD Return | +8.40%Best | -0.16% |
| 1Y Return | +12.95%Best | +3.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74%Best | +6.79% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -18.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $13,257Best | $11,712 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Sep 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 12, 2026 (3.1 years).
ABLD vs FDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs FDIV Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while FDIV returned +3.17%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a loss of 0.16% for FDIV.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.74% per year against +6.79% for FDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 12.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -18.6% for FDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while FDIV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $35 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 2.34% for FDIV.
Holdings Overlap
4.1% of ABLD's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 9.4% of FDIV's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
FDIV and ABLD share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 111 in FDIV, against full books of 51 and 224.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 101 positions for FDIV that do not appear in our book for ABLD (87.2% of the fund), and 28 for ABLD that do not appear in FDIV (63.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and FDIV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or FDIV?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while FDIV charges 0.35%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or FDIV?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +3.17% for FDIV, so ABLD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or FDIV?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 12.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs FDIV -18.6%.
Should I hold both ABLD and FDIV?
ABLD and FDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and FDIV?
9.4% of FDIV's money is in holdings ABLD also owns. 9.4% of FDIV's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 111 in FDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or FDIV?
ABLD yields 3.37% while FDIV yields 2.34%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIV better than ABLD?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.