ABLD vs LSVD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, ABLD or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 33.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $99M | $669M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 0.26% |
| Holdings | 51 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +8.40% | +22.36%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +31.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,717 | $15,003Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 33.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026 (1.8 years).
ABLD vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs LSVD Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while LSVD returned +31.62%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a gain of 22.36% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 13.3% for LSVD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for ABLD and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $40 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 0.26% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
6.4% of ABLD's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 1.5% of LSVD's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and LSVD share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 51 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 135 positions we hold weights for.
ABLD holds 29 positions LSVD does not, 61.2% of the fund.
Largest: APA 4.37%, PBR 4.17%, CQP 3.99%, HTHIY 3.46%, SPG 3.43%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and LSVD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or LSVD?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while LSVD charges 0.40%. ABLD is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or LSVD?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +31.62% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLD annualized +9.20% vs +25.28% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or LSVD?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 13.3% for LSVD. Worst drawdown: ABLD -17.2% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both ABLD and LSVD?
ABLD and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and LSVD?
6.4% of ABLD's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 1.5% of LSVD's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or LSVD?
ABLD yields 3.37% while LSVD yields 0.26%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than ABLD?
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 33.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.