ABLD vs OAKM
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Oakmark US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, ABLD or OAKM?
OAKM has been ahead.
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. OAKM led over 1Y and the full window. OAKM is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | OAKM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $99M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 0.60% |
| Holdings | 51 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +8.40%Best | +6.73% |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +17.09%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -15.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $10,890 | $12,434Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 35.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Oakmark Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Dec 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026 (1.9 years).
ABLD vs OAKM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs OAKM Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while OAKM returned +17.09%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a gain of 6.73% for OAKM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 12.3% for OAKM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for ABLD and -15.2% for OAKM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while OAKM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 0.60% for OAKM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in ABLD and 39 in OAKM, totalling 99.4% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 39 in OAKM, against full books of 51 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for OAKM that do not appear in our book for ABLD (91.2% of the fund), and 32 for ABLD that do not appear in OAKM (67.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and OAKM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or OAKM?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while OAKM charges 0.59%. ABLD is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or OAKM?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +17.09% for OAKM, so OAKM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLD annualized +4.59% vs +12.15% for OAKM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or OAKM?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 12.3% for OAKM. Worst drawdown: ABLD -18.4% vs OAKM -15.2%.
Should I hold both ABLD and OAKM?
ABLD and OAKM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or OAKM?
ABLD yields 3.37% while OAKM yields 0.60%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OAKM better than ABLD?
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. OAKM led over 1Y and the full window. OAKM is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.