ABLD vs XLF
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, ABLD or XLF?
Each has led over a different period.
XLF has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over 1Y and the full window, XLF over 3Y. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $99M | $51.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.40% |
| Holdings | 51 | 160 |
| YTD Return | +8.40%Best | +1.44% |
| 1Y Return | +12.95%Best | +6.19% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +20.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.27% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 17.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -25.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,495Best | $15,398 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5%Best | 57.3% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Oct 12, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs XLF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs XLF Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while XLF returned +6.19%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a gain of 1.44% for XLF.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.74% per year against +20.21% for XLF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 17.1% for ABLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -25.8% for XLF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while XLF charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $8 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.40% for XLF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in ABLD and 77 in XLF, totalling 99.4% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 77 in XLF, against full books of 51 and 160.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 76 positions for XLF that do not appear in our book for ABLD (99.5% of the fund), and 32 for ABLD that do not appear in XLF (67.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and XLF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or XLF?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while XLF charges 0.08%. XLF is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or XLF?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +6.19% for XLF, so ABLD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or XLF?
XLF has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 17.1% for ABLD. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs XLF -25.8%.
Should I hold both ABLD and XLF?
ABLD and XLF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or XLF?
ABLD yields 3.37% while XLF yields 1.40%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLF better than ABLD?
XLF has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over 1Y and the full window, XLF over 3Y. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.