ABOT vs SCHD
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $4M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +13.88% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.88% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.93% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Oct 20, 2011 |
ABOT vs SCHD Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ABOT returned +14.88% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, ABOT is up 13.88% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +21.54% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.93% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ABOT has the edge at +11.85% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.33% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or SCHD?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABOT or SCHD?
Over the past year ABOT returned +14.88% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.85% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABOT or SCHD?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ABOT and SCHD?
ABOT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and SCHD?
ABOT and SCHD share 2 common holdings with a 4.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 148 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or SCHD?
ABOT yields 0.33% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.