ABOT vs IVV
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ABOT or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.53%Best | +13.86% |
| 1Y Return | +14.57% | +21.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.65% | +21.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.38% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,656 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.1%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2020 to Sep 3, 2026 (5.7 years).
ABOT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
ABOT vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +14.57% while IVV returned +21.57%. Year to date, ABOT is up 15.53% versus a gain of 13.86% for IVV.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +20.65% per year against +21.48% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.38% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.26% annualized vs +12.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.33% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
64.6% of ABOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ABOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 505 in IVV, against full books of 52 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 470 positions ABOT does not, 77.6% of the fund.
Largest: MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%, GOOG 2.56%, META 1.94%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABOT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.07% | 7.98% | 2.91% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.90% | 6.86% | 1.96% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.13% | 2.98% | 1.15% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.10% | 0.65% | 2.45% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 2.69% | 0.44% | 2.25% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.67% | 0.10% | 2.57% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.58% | 0.16% | 2.42% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.51% | 0.20% | 2.31% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 2.57% | 0.08% | 2.49% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.46% | 0.15% | 2.31% |
64.6% of ABOT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or IVV?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABOT or IVV?
Over the past year ABOT returned +14.57% vs +21.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +12.01% vs +15.26% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABOT or IVV?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ABOT and IVV?
ABOT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and IVV?
64.6% of ABOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.7% of IVV's is in holdings ABOT also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or IVV?
ABOT yields 0.33% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ABOT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.