ABOT vs IVV
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.88% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.88% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.93% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
ABOT vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +14.88% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ABOT is up 13.88% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +21.54% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.93% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ABOT has the edge at +11.85% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.33% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ABOT and IVV share 27 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or IVV?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABOT or IVV?
Over the past year ABOT returned +14.88% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.85% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABOT or IVV?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABOT and IVV?
ABOT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and IVV?
ABOT and IVV share 27 common holdings with a 17.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or IVV?
ABOT yields 0.33% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.