ABOT vs QQQ
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $4M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.18% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.63% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.72% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ABOT vs QQQ Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +14.63% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, ABOT is up 13.18% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +21.72% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.83% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.0% for ABOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.33% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ABOT and QQQ share 17 holdings out of 135 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or QQQ?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABOT or QQQ?
Over the past year ABOT returned +14.63% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.69% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABOT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.0% for ABOT. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ABOT and QQQ?
ABOT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and QQQ?
ABOT and QQQ share 17 common holdings with a 20.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 135 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or QQQ?
ABOT yields 0.33% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.