ABOT vs VTI
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ABOT or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +13.30% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.11% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.18% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.81% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,707 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (5.8 years).
ABOT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.
ABOT vs VTI Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +7.11% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, ABOT is up 13.30% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +22.18% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.81% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.88% annualized vs +11.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.30% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of ABOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 18.6% of VTI's money is in holdings ABOT also owns.
Most of ABOT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, ABOT as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 52 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,101 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ABOT (78.8% of the fund), and 1 for ABOT that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABOT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.20% | 6.29% | 1.09% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.06% | 6.40% | 1.34% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.42% | 2.56% | 1.86% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.09% | 0.61% | 2.48% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.84% | 0.22% | 2.62% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.62% | 0.14% | 2.48% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.44% | 0.14% | 2.30% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 2.52% | 0.03% | 2.49% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.25% | 0.26% | 1.99% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 2.36% | 0.13% | 2.23% |
98.3% of ABOT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or VTI?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABOT or VTI?
Over the past year ABOT returned +7.11% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.46% vs +13.88% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABOT or VTI?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ABOT and VTI?
ABOT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and VTI?
98.3% of ABOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 18.6% of VTI's is in holdings ABOT also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or VTI?
ABOT yields 0.30% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ABOT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.