ABOT vs VOO
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ABOT or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.51% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.18% | +19.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.90% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,316 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2020 to Sep 8, 2026 (5.7 years).
ABOT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
ABOT vs VOO Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +8.18% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, ABOT is up 11.51% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +19.41% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.90% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.03% annualized vs +11.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
64.6% of ABOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 20.7% of VOO's money is in holdings ABOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 504 in VOO, against full books of 52 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 467 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ABOT (78.6% of the fund), and 22 for ABOT that do not appear in VOO (33.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABOT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.07% | 7.51% | 2.44% |
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 4.90% | 6.59% | 1.69% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.13% | 2.77% | 1.36% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.10% | 0.69% | 2.41% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common | 2.69% | 0.43% | 2.26% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.67% | 0.09% | 2.58% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems Inc. | 2.58% | 0.13% | 2.45% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.51% | 0.18% | 2.33% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 2.57% | 0.06% | 2.51% |
| FTNTFortinet | 2.46% | 0.15% | 2.31% |
64.6% of ABOT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or VOO?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABOT or VOO?
Over the past year ABOT returned +8.18% vs +19.43% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.29% vs +15.03% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABOT or VOO?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both ABOT and VOO?
ABOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and VOO?
64.6% of ABOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 20.7% of VOO's is in holdings ABOT also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or VOO?
ABOT yields 0.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ABOT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.