ABOT vs VOO
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.94% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.17% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.02% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.21% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ABOT vs VOO Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +15.17% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, ABOT is up 13.94% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +22.02% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.21% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.33% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ABOT and VOO share 27 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or VOO?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABOT or VOO?
Over the past year ABOT returned +15.17% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.83% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABOT or VOO?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ABOT and VOO?
ABOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and VOO?
ABOT and VOO share 27 common holdings with a 17.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or VOO?
ABOT yields 0.33% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.