ABOT vs VYM
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ABOT or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ABOT led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 52 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.53%Best | +15.29% |
| 1Y Return | +14.57% | +22.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.65%Best | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.38% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,656 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2020 to Sep 3, 2026 (5.7 years).
ABOT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
ABOT vs VYM Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +14.57% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, ABOT is up 15.53% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +20.65% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.38% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +13.82% annualized vs +12.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 13.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.33% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
20.4% of ABOT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.4% of VYM's money is in holdings ABOT also owns.
ABOT and VYM share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 603 in VYM, against full books of 52 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 603 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 560 positions ABOT does not, 86.0% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 3.38%, JNJ 2.54%, XOM 2.36%, CAT 2.01%, CSCO 1.93%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABOT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.13% | 7.29% | 3.16% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.10% | 1.85% | 1.25% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.51% | 0.49% | 2.02% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 2.50% | 0.09% | 2.41% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 2.34% | 0.13% | 2.21% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.54% | 0.81% | 0.73% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.65% | 0.65% | 1.00% |
| HASHasbro Inc. | 1.50% | 0.05% | 1.45% |
| TTCThe Toro Co. | 1.14% | 0.04% | 1.10% |
20.4% of ABOT is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or VYM?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABOT or VYM?
Over the past year ABOT returned +14.57% vs +22.23% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +12.01% vs +13.82% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABOT or VYM?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 13.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both ABOT and VYM?
ABOT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and VYM?
20.4% of ABOT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.4% of VYM's is in holdings ABOT also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or VYM?
ABOT yields 0.33% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ABOT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ABOT led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.