ABOT vs SPY
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $4M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +15.06% | +14.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.91% | +21.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.52% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.07% | +13.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Jan 22, 1993 |
ABOT vs SPY Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ABOT returned +14.91% while SPY returned +21.96%. Year to date, ABOT is up 15.06% versus a gain of 14.47% for SPY.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +21.52% per year against +21.70% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +10.07% and +13.30% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ABOT has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $9 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.35% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
ABOT and SPY share 27 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or SPY?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABOT or SPY?
Over the past year ABOT returned +14.91% vs +21.96% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +12.06% vs +8.87% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABOT or SPY?
ABOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABOT and SPY?
ABOT and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and SPY?
ABOT and SPY share 27 common holdings with a 17.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or SPY?
ABOT yields 0.35% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.