ACSI vs VYM
American Customer Satisfaction ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ACSI or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ACSI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $117M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 33 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.08%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +16.80%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.85%Best | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.76% | +12.05%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,930 | $17,663Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Exponential ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2016 to Sep 22, 2026 (9.9 years).
ACSI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.9 years both funds cover.
ACSI vs VYM Performance
American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is an ETF from Exponential ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACSI returned +16.80% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, ACSI is up 15.08% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Over three years, ACSI compounded at +20.85% per year against +17.78% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.76% and +12.05% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ACSI has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +10.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACSI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 14.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACSI and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSI charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSI currently yields 0.79% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
51.6% of ACSI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.1% of VYM's money is in holdings ACSI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ACSI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 33 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 510 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ACSI (82.9% of the fund), and 11 for ACSI that do not appear in VYM (41.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSI | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.62% | 3.82% | 0.20% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 4.80% | 0.50% | 4.30% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.56% | 1.66% | 1.90% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 4.08% | 0.64% | 3.44% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.86% | 0.80% | 3.06% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 3.04% | 1.38% | 1.66% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 2.60% | 1.34% | 1.26% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 2.31% | 1.52% | 0.79% |
| PRUPrudential Financial Inc | 3.53% | 0.17% | 3.36% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 3.24% | 0.34% | 2.90% |
51.6% of ACSI is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSI or VYM?
ACSI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSI or VYM?
Over the past year ACSI returned +16.80% vs +15.42% for VYM, so ACSI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ACSI annualized +13.14% vs +10.28% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACSI or VYM?
ACSI has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 14.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ACSI -34.5% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both ACSI and VYM?
ACSI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSI and VYM?
51.6% of ACSI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.1% of VYM's is in holdings ACSI also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ACSI and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSI or VYM?
ACSI yields 0.79% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ACSI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ACSI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.