ACSI vs VOO
American Customer Satisfaction ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $116M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.29% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.47% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.50% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Exponential ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ACSI vs VOO Performance
American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is a ETF from Exponential ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACSI returned +20.24% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, ACSI is up 17.29% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, ACSI compounded at +19.47% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.50% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +13.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACSI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACSI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSI charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSI currently yields 0.82% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ACSI and VOO share 4 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSI or VOO?
ACSI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACSI or VOO?
Over the past year ACSI returned +20.24% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ACSI annualized +13.52% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACSI or VOO?
ACSI has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ACSI -34.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ACSI and VOO?
ACSI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSI and VOO?
ACSI and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 8.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSI or VOO?
ACSI yields 0.82% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.