ACSI vs QQQ
American Customer Satisfaction ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ACSI or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ACSI is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $118M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 33 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +17.01% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.93% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.02% | +24.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.53% | +14.18%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,764 | $19,407Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.2%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Exponential ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.8 years).
ACSI vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
ACSI vs QQQ Performance
American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is an ETF from Exponential ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ACSI returned +17.93% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, ACSI is up 17.01% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Over three years, ACSI compounded at +20.02% per year against +24.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.53% and +14.18% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.75% annualized vs +13.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.6% for ACSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACSI and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSI charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSI currently yields 0.80% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
33.2% of ACSI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings ACSI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ACSI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 33 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ACSI (73.3% of the fund), and 22 for ACSI that do not appear in QQQ (60.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSI | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.14% | 7.27% | 0.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.12% | 4.67% | 0.45% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.49% | 3.13% | 1.36% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 4.51% | 2.78% | 1.73% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 2.87% | 2.41% | 0.46% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 2.83% | 1.84% | 0.99% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.09% | 1.37% | 1.72% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 3.16% | 0.82% | 2.34% |
33.2% of ACSI is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSI or QQQ?
ACSI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSI or QQQ?
Over the past year ACSI returned +17.93% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ACSI annualized +13.41% vs +20.75% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACSI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.6% for ACSI. Worst drawdown: ACSI -34.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both ACSI and QQQ?
ACSI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSI and QQQ?
33.2% of ACSI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.3% of QQQ's is in holdings ACSI also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ACSI and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSI or QQQ?
ACSI yields 0.80% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ACSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ACSI?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ACSI is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.