ACSI vs VTI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACSI or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $117M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.65%Best | +12.43% |
| 1Y Return | +15.06% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.68% | +22.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.57% | +12.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 15.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,793 | $17,916Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Exponential ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2016 to Sep 28, 2026 (9.9 years).
ACSI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.9 years both funds cover.
ACSI vs VTI Performance
American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is an ETF from Exponential ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACSI returned +15.06% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, ACSI is up 13.65% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Over three years, ACSI compounded at +20.68% per year against +22.42% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.57% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.29% annualized vs +12.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.7% for ACSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACSI and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSI charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSI currently yields 0.79% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.5% of ACSI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.8% of VTI's money is in holdings ACSI also owns.
Most of ACSI is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
29 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ACSI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 33 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ACSI (76.7% of the fund), and 0 for ACSI that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.52% | 6.29% | 1.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.85% | 3.65% | 1.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.23% | 2.31% | 1.92% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.48% | 1.70% | 2.78% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 4.80% | 0.16% | 4.64% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.62% | 1.31% | 2.31% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 4.08% | 0.22% | 3.86% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.56% | 0.55% | 3.01% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.86% | 0.24% | 3.62% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 3.71% | 0.24% | 3.47% |
93.5% of ACSI is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSI or VTI?
ACSI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSI or VTI?
Over the past year ACSI returned +15.06% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ACSI annualized +12.98% vs +14.29% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACSI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.7% for ACSI. Worst drawdown: ACSI -34.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ACSI and VTI?
ACSI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSI and VTI?
93.5% of ACSI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.8% of VTI's is in holdings ACSI also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ACSI and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSI or VTI?
ACSI yields 0.79% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACSI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.