ALRG vs VTI
Allspring LT Large Core ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ALRG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALRG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.49% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.60% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ALRG vs VTI Performance
Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ALRG returned +22.60% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, ALRG is up 12.49% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.8% for ALRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for ALRG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALRG charges 0.28% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALRG currently yields 0.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ALRG and VTI share 43 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALRG or VTI?
ALRG has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ALRG or VTI?
Over the past year ALRG returned +22.60% vs +22.35% for VTI, so ALRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ALRG annualized +23.10% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ALRG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.8% for ALRG. Worst drawdown: ALRG -9.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ALRG and VTI?
ALRG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ALRG and VTI?
ALRG and VTI share 43 common holdings with a 34.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALRG or VTI?
ALRG yields 0.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.