ALRG vs VOO
Allspring LT Large Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ALRG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALRG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.49% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.60% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ALRG vs VOO Performance
Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ALRG returned +22.60% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, ALRG is up 12.49% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.8% for ALRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for ALRG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALRG charges 0.28% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALRG currently yields 0.42% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ALRG and VOO share 42 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALRG or VOO?
ALRG has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ALRG or VOO?
Over the past year ALRG returned +22.60% vs +21.87% for VOO, so ALRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ALRG annualized +23.10% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ALRG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.8% for ALRG. Worst drawdown: ALRG -9.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ALRG and VOO?
ALRG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ALRG and VOO?
ALRG and VOO share 42 common holdings with a 38.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALRG or VOO?
ALRG yields 0.42% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.