AMGR vs IVV
Amana Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AMGR or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMGR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 31 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.52% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.61% |
| Fund Family | Amana Mutual Funds Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AMGR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMGR vs IVV Performance
Amana Growth ETF (AMGR) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AMGR is up 2.52% versus a gain of 12.98% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMGR charges 0.61% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 32.3% of IVV's money is in holdings AMGR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for AMGR, our book for it covers 94.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 31 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMGR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.40% | 8.07% | 0.67% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.10% | 7.02% | 1.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.90% | 5.69% | 0.21% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.90% | 3.00% | 3.90% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.90% | 2.65% | 3.25% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.50% | 1.38% | 3.12% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 3.40% | 1.16% | 2.24% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 3.60% | 0.23% | 3.37% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.00% | 0.68% | 2.32% |
| JCIJohnson Controls International Plc | 3.00% | 0.13% | 2.87% |
32.3% of IVV is already inside AMGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMGR or IVV?
AMGR has an expense ratio of 0.61% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AMGR and IVV?
At least 32.3% of IVV's money is in holdings AMGR also owns. Our book for AMGR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMGR or IVV?
AMGR yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AMGR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.