AMGR vs IVV

AMGR vs IVV

Which is better, AMGR or IVV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.6%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAMGRIVV
Expense Ratio0.61%0.03%Best
AUM$7M$886.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.10%
Holdings31508
YTD Return+1.22%+13.39%Best
1Y Return-+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.88%
Top 10 Weight57.6%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyAmana Mutual Funds TrustiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 24, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AMGR vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AMGR vs IVV Performance

Amana Growth ETF (AMGR) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AMGR is up 1.22% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AMGR charges 0.61% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

AMGR already in IVV68.6%
IVV already in AMGR32.1%

68.6% of AMGR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 32.1% of IVV's money is in holdings AMGR also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

19 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 31 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 478 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AMGR (67.2% of the fund), and 1 for AMGR that do not appear in IVV (1.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AMGRWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.6.90%7.98%1.08%
AAPLApple, Inc7.80%6.86%0.94%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.70%5.44%0.26%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A6.50%3.19%3.31%
AVGOBroadcom Inc6.10%2.98%3.12%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.5.00%1.39%3.61%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc3.40%1.18%2.22%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.3.10%0.65%2.45%
NOWServicenow, Inc3.30%0.18%3.12%
JCIJohnson Controls International Plc2.90%0.14%2.76%

68.6% of AMGR is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AMGRIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AMGR or IVV?

AMGR has an expense ratio of 0.61% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AMGR and IVV?

68.6% of AMGR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 32.1% of IVV's is in holdings AMGR also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, AMGR or IVV?

AMGR yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than AMGR?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.