AMGR vs VTI
Amana Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AMGR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMGR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.52% | +12.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% |
| Fund Family | Amana Mutual Funds Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AMGR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMGR vs VTI Performance
Amana Growth ETF (AMGR) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AMGR is up 2.52% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMGR charges 0.61% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 28.5% of VTI's money is in holdings AMGR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for AMGR, our book for it covers 94.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and AMGR share little of their money.
22 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 31 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMGR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.10% | 6.29% | 1.81% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.40% | 6.40% | 1.00% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.90% | 4.79% | 1.11% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.90% | 2.90% | 4.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.90% | 2.56% | 3.34% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.50% | 1.35% | 3.15% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 3.40% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 3.60% | 0.16% | 3.44% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.00% | 0.61% | 2.39% |
| JCIJohnson Controls International Plc | 3.00% | 0.12% | 2.88% |
28.5% of VTI is already inside AMGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMGR or VTI?
AMGR has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AMGR and VTI?
At least 28.5% of VTI's money is in holdings AMGR also owns. Our book for AMGR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMGR or VTI?
AMGR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AMGR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.