AMGR vs QQQ
Amana Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, AMGR or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMGR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 58 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +2.69% | +21.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% |
| Fund Family | Amana Mutual Funds Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AMGR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMGR vs QQQ Performance
Amana Growth ETF (AMGR) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AMGR is up 2.69% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMGR charges 0.61% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $18 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMGR currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 35.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings AMGR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for AMGR, our book for it covers 94.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 58 and 321.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMGR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.50% | 7.80% | 0.70% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.10% | 8.45% | 1.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.90% | 5.88% | 0.02% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.90% | 3.15% | 3.75% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 6.10% | 2.74% | 3.36% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc | 3.70% | 3.71% | 0.01% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.90% | 1.95% | 0.05% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.00% | 1.60% | 0.40% |
35.3% of QQQ is already inside AMGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMGR or QQQ?
AMGR has an expense ratio of 0.61% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AMGR and QQQ?
At least 35.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings AMGR also owns. Our book for AMGR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMGR and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMGR or QQQ?
AMGR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than AMGR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.