ANGU vs VOO

ANGU vs VOO

Which is better, ANGU or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.3%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricANGUVOO
Expense Ratio0.10%0.03%Best
AUM$445M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings239509
YTD Return-0.74%+11.98%Best
1Y Return-+16.45%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.19%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight38.3%37.6%Best
Fund FamilySEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDSVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 6, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ANGU vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ANGU vs VOO Performance

SEI Ang Research Enhanced US Large Cap ETF (ANGU) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ANGU is down 0.74% versus a gain of 11.98% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ANGU charges 0.10% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANGU currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

ANGU already in VOO94.3%
VOO already in ANGU76.9%

94.3% of ANGU's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 76.9% of VOO's money is in holdings ANGU also owns.

Most of ANGU is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

205 positions in common, counted across the 239 positions we hold weights for in ANGU and 494 in VOO, against full books of 239 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 282 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ANGU (22.3% of the fund), and 28 for ANGU that do not appear in VOO (4.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ANGUWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.21%7.55%0.66%
AAPLApple, Inc7.05%7.05%0.00%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.41%5.36%0.05%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.88%4.13%0.25%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.14%3.24%0.10%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.80%2.62%0.18%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.52%2.86%0.34%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.90%0.00%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.75%1.41%0.34%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.67%1.44%0.23%

94.3% of ANGU is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ANGUVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ANGU or VOO?

ANGU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ANGU and VOO?

94.3% of ANGU's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 76.9% of VOO's is in holdings ANGU also owns. They hold 205 positions in common, counted across the 239 positions we hold weights for in ANGU and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, ANGU or VOO?

ANGU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ANGU?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.