AOD vs ELCV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Eventide High Dividend ETF
Quick Verdict
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | ELCV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $251M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 2.06% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +18.70% | +19.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.40% | +26.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.21% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -18.4% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Eventide | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 30, 2024 |
AOD vs ELCV Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) is a ETF from Eventide. Over the past year AOD returned +33.40% while ELCV returned +26.62%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.70% versus a gain of 19.84% for ELCV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 13.8% for ELCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -18.4% for ELCV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while ELCV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $49 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 2.06% for ELCV.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and ELCV share 7 holdings out of 124 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or ELCV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while ELCV charges 0.49%. ELCV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or ELCV?
Over the past year AOD returned +33.40% vs +26.62% for ELCV, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOD annualized -4.02% vs +15.75% for ELCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or ELCV?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 13.8% for ELCV. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs ELCV -18.4%.
Should I hold both AOD and ELCV?
AOD and ELCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and ELCV?
AOD and ELCV share 7 common holdings with a 9.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 124 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or ELCV?
AOD yields 11.72% while ELCV yields 2.06%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.