ASLV vs VYM

ASLV vs VYM

Which is better, ASLV or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricASLVVYM
Expense Ratio0.35%0.04%Best
AUM$203M$78.9B
Dividend Yield0.82%2.37%
Holdings46608
YTD Return+10.13%+14.86%Best
1Y Return+12.49%+17.97%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.14%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.69%
Volatility (annualized)10.8%Tie10.8%Tie
Max Drawdown-11.0%Best-11.3%
$10,000 over 1.6 years$12,651$13,179Best
Top 10 Weight39.6%25.8%Best
Fund FamilyAllspring Global InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 26, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2025 to Oct 28, 2026 (1.6 years).

ASLV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.

ASLV vs VYM Performance

Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASLV returned +12.49% while VYM returned +17.97%. Year to date, ASLV is up 10.13% versus a gain of 14.86% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ASLV and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 10.8% annualized.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for ASLV and -11.3% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ASLV charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASLV currently yields 0.82% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

ASLV already in VYM32.4%
VYM already in ASLV23.1%

32.4% of ASLV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 23.1% of VYM's money is in holdings ASLV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in ASLV and 602 in VYM, against full books of 46 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 559 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ASLV (76.3% of the fund), and 23 for ASLV that do not appear in VYM (57.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ASLVWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.49%6.94%5.45%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common3.17%2.58%0.59%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd1.94%2.70%0.76%
NEENextera Energy Inc3.44%0.69%2.75%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.2.90%1.07%1.83%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.3.14%0.54%2.60%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials1.77%1.65%0.12%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.012.55%0.65%1.90%
HDHome Depot Inc/The1.55%1.32%0.23%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated0.88%1.42%0.54%

32.4% of ASLV is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ASLVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ASLV or VYM?

ASLV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ASLV or VYM?

Over the past year ASLV returned +12.49% vs +17.97% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ASLV annualized +15.83% vs +18.83% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ASLV or VYM?

ASLV and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 10.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: ASLV -11.0% vs VYM -11.3%.

Should I hold both ASLV and VYM?

ASLV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ASLV and VYM?

32.4% of ASLV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 23.1% of VYM's is in holdings ASLV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in ASLV and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, ASLV or VYM?

ASLV yields 0.82% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than ASLV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.