ASLV vs VYM
Allspring Special Large Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ASLV or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASLV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $216M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 46 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.36% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.38% | +17.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5% | 9.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0%Best | -11.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,387 | $13,057Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.5 years).
ASLV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
ASLV vs VYM Performance
Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASLV returned +11.38% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, ASLV is up 7.36% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.5% compared with 9.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for ASLV and -11.3% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASLV charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASLV currently yields 0.80% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
34.3% of ASLV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.6% of VYM's money is in holdings ASLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, ASLV as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
17 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in ASLV and 603 in VYM, against full books of 46 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 552 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ASLV (76.9% of the fund), and 23 for ASLV that do not appear in VYM (55.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASLV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.88% | 7.29% | 5.41% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 3.19% | 2.54% | 0.65% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 3.70% | 0.76% | 2.94% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.88% | 2.36% | 0.48% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 3.55% | 0.52% | 3.03% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.85% | 1.05% | 1.80% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 2.03% | 1.56% | 0.47% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.78% | 1.46% | 0.32% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 2.39% | 0.53% | 1.86% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc. Class A | 1.97% | 0.31% | 1.66% |
34.3% of ASLV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASLV or VYM?
ASLV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASLV or VYM?
Over the past year ASLV returned +11.38% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ASLV annualized +15.34% vs +19.46% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASLV or VYM?
ASLV has been the more volatile fund at 10.5% annualized versus 9.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ASLV -11.0% vs VYM -11.3%.
Should I hold both ASLV and VYM?
ASLV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASLV and VYM?
34.3% of ASLV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.6% of VYM's is in holdings ASLV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in ASLV and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASLV or VYM?
ASLV yields 0.80% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ASLV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.