ASLV vs IVV
Allspring Special Large Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASLV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $221M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +9.98% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.54% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ASLV vs IVV Performance
Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASLV returned +15.54% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ASLV is up 9.98% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.4% for ASLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for ASLV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASLV charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASLV currently yields 0.80% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASLV and IVV share 36 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASLV or IVV?
ASLV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASLV or IVV?
Over the past year ASLV returned +15.54% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASLV annualized +18.04% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASLV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.4% for ASLV. Worst drawdown: ASLV -11.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASLV and IVV?
ASLV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASLV and IVV?
ASLV and IVV share 36 common holdings with a 25.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASLV or IVV?
ASLV yields 0.80% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.