ASLV vs VTI
Allspring Special Large Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASLV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $221M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.47% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.60% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ASLV vs VTI Performance
Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASLV returned +16.60% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, ASLV is up 10.47% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.3% for ASLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for ASLV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASLV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASLV currently yields 0.80% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ASLV and VTI share 35 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASLV or VTI?
ASLV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASLV or VTI?
Over the past year ASLV returned +16.60% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASLV annualized +18.37% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASLV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.3% for ASLV. Worst drawdown: ASLV -11.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ASLV and VTI?
ASLV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASLV and VTI?
ASLV and VTI share 35 common holdings with a 22.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASLV or VTI?
ASLV yields 0.80% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.