ASLV vs VTI
Allspring Special Large Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ASLV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASLV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $216M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 46 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.27% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.11% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0%Best | -12.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,337 | $13,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).
ASLV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
ASLV vs VTI Performance
Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASLV returned +10.11% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, ASLV is up 7.27% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 10.5% for ASLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for ASLV and -12.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASLV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASLV currently yields 0.80% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
85.5% of ASLV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 28.9% of VTI's money is in holdings ASLV also owns.
Most of ASLV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
37 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in ASLV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 46 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,113 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ASLV (68.6% of the fund), and 2 for ASLV that do not appear in VTI (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASLV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.65% | 3.65% | 4.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.64% | 6.29% | 2.65% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.79% | 4.79% | 0.00% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.94% | 2.31% | 0.63% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.43% | 1.28% | 2.15% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.88% | 2.56% | 0.68% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.19% | 0.86% | 2.33% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 3.70% | 0.25% | 3.45% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 3.55% | 0.18% | 3.37% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.52% | 0.83% | 1.69% |
85.5% of ASLV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASLV or VTI?
ASLV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASLV or VTI?
Over the past year ASLV returned +10.11% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ASLV annualized +15.03% vs +23.46% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASLV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 10.5% for ASLV. Worst drawdown: ASLV -11.0% vs VTI -12.6%.
Should I hold both ASLV and VTI?
ASLV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASLV and VTI?
85.5% of ASLV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 28.9% of VTI's is in holdings ASLV also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in ASLV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASLV or VTI?
ASLV yields 0.80% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ASLV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.