ATFV vs BAI

ATFV vs BAI

Which is better, ATFV or BAI?

BAI has been ahead.

BAI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: BAI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricATFVBAI
Expense Ratio0.55%Tie0.55%Tie
AUM$629M$14.2B
Dividend Yield0.17%1.26%
Holdings3655
YTD Return+5.93%+19.57%Best
1Y Return+6.82%+17.67%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+37.16%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.87%-
Volatility (annualized)26.8%Best38.8%
Max Drawdown-29.0%Best-34.1%
$10,000 over 2 years$16,015$16,428Best
Fund FamilyAlgeriShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 4, 2021Oct 21, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 (2 years).

ATFV vs BAI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

Compare ATFV against instead:ATFV vs SPYATFV vs QQQATFV vs VOOATFV vs VTIBAI against:BAI vs VXUS

ATFV vs BAI Performance

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +6.82% while BAI returned +17.67%. Year to date, ATFV is up 5.93% versus a gain of 19.57% for BAI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.8% compared with 26.8% for ATFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for ATFV and -34.1% for BAI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ATFV charges 0.55% per year while BAI charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $55 annually. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 1.26% for BAI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ATFV and BAI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ATFVBAI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ATFV or BAI?

ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while BAI charges 0.55%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, ATFV or BAI?

Over the past year ATFV returned +6.82% vs +17.67% for BAI, so BAI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ATFV annualized +26.55% vs +28.17% for BAI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ATFV or BAI?

BAI has been the more volatile fund at 38.8% annualized versus 26.8% for ATFV. Worst drawdown: ATFV -29.0% vs BAI -34.1%.

Should I hold both ATFV and BAI?

ATFV and BAI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or BAI?

ATFV yields 0.17% while BAI yields 1.26%, so BAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BAI better than ATFV?

BAI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.