AVLV vs BKDV
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF vs BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
Which is better, AVLV or BKDV?
Nearly the same fund. AVLV costs less.
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVLV | BKDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $22.3B | $2.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.52% |
| Holdings | 615 | 162 |
| YTD Return | +24.38%Best | +20.53% |
| 1Y Return | +30.56%Best | +25.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.78% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.79% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -15.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,719Best | $14,244 |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | BNY Mellon Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Nov 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2 years).
AVLV vs BKDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
AVLV vs BKDV Performance
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management. Over the past year AVLV returned +30.56% while BKDV returned +25.37%. Year to date, AVLV is up 24.38% versus a gain of 20.53% for BKDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.6% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for AVLV and -15.5% for BKDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVLV charges 0.15% per year while BKDV charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $60 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVLV currently yields 1.09% against 0.52% for BKDV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AVLV and BKDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVLV or BKDV?
AVLV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while BKDV charges 0.60%. AVLV is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVLV or BKDV?
Over the past year AVLV returned +30.56% vs +25.37% for BKDV, so AVLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AVLV annualized +21.32% vs +19.35% for BKDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVLV or BKDV?
AVLV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.6% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: AVLV -19.5% vs BKDV -15.5%.
Should I hold both AVLV and BKDV?
AVLV and BKDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVLV or BKDV?
AVLV yields 1.09% while BKDV yields 0.52%, so AVLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BKDV better than AVLV?
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.