AVOS vs IVV

AVOS vs IVV

Which is better, AVOS or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVOSIVV
Expense Ratio0.64%0.03%Best
AUM$111M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings180508
YTD Return+10.29%+11.51%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.66%
Top 10 Weight45.8%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyAvos Capital Management, LLCiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 5, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AVOS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AVOS vs IVV Performance

Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) is an ETF from Avos Capital Management, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AVOS is up 10.29% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVOS charges 0.64% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVOS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

AVOS already in IVV35.0%
IVV already in AVOS38.3%

35.0% of AVOS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 38.3% of IVV's money is in holdings AVOS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

97 positions in common, counted across the 238 positions we hold weights for in AVOS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 180 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 385 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AVOS (60.4% of the fund), and 31 for AVOS that do not appear in IVV (46.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVOSWeight in IVVDifference
AAPLApple, Inc1.96%7.02%5.06%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp1.79%5.69%3.90%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.45%3.84%2.39%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.01%3.00%0.99%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.11%1.39%0.28%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common0.79%0.97%0.18%
VVisa Inc Class A0.75%0.95%0.20%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.0.63%1.01%0.38%
WMTWalmart, Inc.0.81%0.69%0.12%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.0.76%0.55%0.21%

38.3% of IVV is already inside AVOS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AVOSIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVOS or IVV?

AVOS has an expense ratio of 0.64% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AVOS and IVV?

38.3% of IVV's money is in holdings AVOS also owns. 38.3% of IVV's is in holdings AVOS also owns. They hold 97 positions in common, counted across the 238 positions we hold weights for in AVOS and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVOS or IVV?

AVOS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than AVOS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.