AVUC vs BAGX

AVUC vs BAGX

Which is better, AVUC or BAGX?

AVUC costs less.

AVUC has a lower expense ratio. BAGX is less concentrated, with 27.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: AVUCLess Concentrated: BAGX

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVUCBAGX
Expense Ratio0.17%Best0.73%
AUM-$188M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1,56897
YTD Return-0.65%-0.49%Best
Top 10 Weight36.4%27.5%Best
Fund FamilyAvantis InvestorsBridgeway Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 13, 2026Jul 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AVUC vs BAGX growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AVUC against instead:AVUC vs SPYAVUC vs QQQAVUC vs VOOAVUC vs VTIBAGX against:BAGX vs VXUS

AVUC vs BAGX Performance

Avantis US Core Equity ETF (AVUC) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds. Year to date, AVUC is down 0.65% versus a loss of 0.49% for BAGX.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVUC charges 0.17% per year while BAGX charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $73 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVUC currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for BAGX.

Holdings Overlap

AVUC already in BAGX27.6%
BAGX already in AVUC99.2%

27.6% of AVUC's money is in holdings BAGX also owns. 99.2% of BAGX's money is in holdings AVUC also owns.

Most of BAGX is already inside AVUC. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

93 positions in common, counted across the 1,568 positions we hold weights for in AVUC and 96 in BAGX, against full books of 1,568 and 97.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 2 positions for BAGX that do not appear in our book for AVUC (0.4% of the fund), and 485 for AVUC that do not appear in BAGX (66.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVUCWeight in BAGXDifference
AAPLApple, Inc5.32%4.91%0.41%
NVDANvidia Corp.3.91%5.10%1.19%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.97%3.84%0.13%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.05%3.51%2.46%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.69%1.67%0.02%
MAMastercard Inc1.44%1.20%0.24%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.24%1.19%0.05%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.0.76%1.60%0.84%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.0.45%1.91%1.46%
VVisa Inc1.10%1.17%0.07%

99.2% of BAGX is already inside AVUC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AVUCBAGX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVUC or BAGX?

AVUC has an expense ratio of 0.17% while BAGX charges 0.73%. AVUC is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AVUC and BAGX?

99.2% of BAGX's money is in holdings AVUC also owns. 99.2% of BAGX's is in holdings AVUC also owns. They hold 93 positions in common, counted across the 1,568 positions we hold weights for in AVUC and 96 in BAGX.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVUC or BAGX?

AVUC yields 0.00% while BAGX yields 0.00%, so BAGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BAGX better than AVUC?

AVUC has a lower expense ratio. BAGX is less concentrated, with 27.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.