BAMG vs QQQ
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $132M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.51% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.05% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.60% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BAMG vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +24.05% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, BAMG is up 11.51% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +22.60% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMG has the edge at +22.60% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.3% for BAMG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $18 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BAMG and QQQ share 41 holdings out of 161 unique holdings combined, representing a 51.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or QQQ?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMG or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMG returned +24.05% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMG annualized +22.60% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.3% for BAMG. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BAMG and QQQ?
BAMG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and QQQ?
BAMG and QQQ share 41 common holdings with a 51.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 161 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or QQQ?
BAMG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.