BAMG vs QQQ
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BAMG or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. BAMG is less concentrated, with 39.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $127M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 101 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +10.29% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.92% | +22.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.52% | +25.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,945 | $20,649Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3 years).
BAMG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMG vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +16.92% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, BAMG is up 10.29% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +21.52% per year against +25.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for BAMG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $18 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.01% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
50.1% of BAMG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 58.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BAMG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
38 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 101 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 58 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BAMG (39.0% of the fund), and 57 for BAMG that do not appear in QQQ (43.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.24% | 8.44% | 4.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.52% | 7.27% | 2.75% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.61% | 4.43% | 0.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.21% | 4.67% | 0.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.04% | 3.36% | 0.68% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 3.16% | 0.88% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.75% | 3.45% | 0.70% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.39% | 2.78% | 0.61% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.86% | 0.44% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.52% | 1.60% | 0.08% |
58.5% of QQQ is already inside BAMG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or QQQ?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMG or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMG returned +16.92% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for BAMG. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BAMG and QQQ?
BAMG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and QQQ?
58.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BAMG also owns. 58.5% of QQQ's is in holdings BAMG also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or QQQ?
BAMG yields 0.01% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BAMG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. BAMG is less concentrated, with 39.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.