BAMG vs VTI
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BAMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $132M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.51% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.05% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.60% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BAMG vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +24.05% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, BAMG is up 11.51% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +22.60% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMG has the edge at +22.60% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.3% for BAMG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BAMG and VTI share 95 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or VTI?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMG or VTI?
Over the past year BAMG returned +24.05% vs +22.35% for VTI, so BAMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMG annualized +22.60% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.3% for BAMG. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BAMG and VTI?
BAMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and VTI?
BAMG and VTI share 95 common holdings with a 43.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or VTI?
BAMG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.