BAMG vs VTI
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BAMG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BAMG led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $127M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 101 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.29% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.92%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.52%Best | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,945 | $18,482Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3 years).
BAMG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMG vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +16.92% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, BAMG is up 10.29% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +21.52% per year against +20.89% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.7% of BAMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.1% of VTI's money is in holdings BAMG also owns.
Most of BAMG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
94 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 101 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,056 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BAMG (52.3% of the fund), and 1 for BAMG that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.52% | 6.29% | 1.77% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.24% | 6.40% | 2.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.21% | 3.65% | 0.56% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.04% | 2.90% | 1.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 2.56% | 1.48% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.61% | 1.29% | 3.32% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.46% | 1.35% | 3.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.39% | 1.70% | 1.69% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.03% | 0.83% | 2.20% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.75% | 1.08% | 1.67% |
93.7% of BAMG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or VTI?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMG or VTI?
Over the past year BAMG returned +16.92% vs +16.78% for VTI, so BAMG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMG or VTI?
BAMG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BAMG and VTI?
BAMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and VTI?
93.7% of BAMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 45.1% of VTI's is in holdings BAMG also owns. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or VTI?
BAMG yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BAMG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BAMG led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.