BAMG vs VOO
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BAMG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BAMG led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $127M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 101 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.88% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.84%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.72%Best | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $18,034 | $18,672Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BAMG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMG vs VOO Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +16.84% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, BAMG is up 10.88% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +21.72% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.01% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
93.3% of BAMG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 50.8% of VOO's money is in holdings BAMG also owns.
Most of BAMG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
91 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 101 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 396 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BAMG (48.4% of the fund), and 4 for BAMG that do not appear in VOO (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.24% | 7.55% | 3.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.52% | 7.05% | 2.53% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.21% | 4.13% | 0.08% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.04% | 3.24% | 0.80% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 2.86% | 1.18% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.61% | 1.44% | 3.17% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.46% | 1.41% | 3.05% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.39% | 1.90% | 1.49% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.03% | 0.93% | 2.10% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.75% | 1.21% | 1.54% |
93.3% of BAMG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or VOO?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMG or VOO?
Over the past year BAMG returned +16.84% vs +16.61% for VOO, so BAMG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMG or VOO?
BAMG has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BAMG and VOO?
BAMG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and VOO?
93.3% of BAMG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 50.8% of VOO's is in holdings BAMG also owns. They hold 91 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or VOO?
BAMG yields 0.01% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BAMG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BAMG led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.