BAMG vs IVV
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $132M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.89% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.87% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.39% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BAMG vs IVV Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +22.87% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, BAMG is up 10.89% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +22.39% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMG has the edge at +22.39% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BAMG and IVV share 94 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or IVV?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMG or IVV?
Over the past year BAMG returned +22.87% vs +20.94% for IVV, so BAMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMG annualized +22.39% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMG or IVV?
BAMG has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BAMG and IVV?
BAMG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and IVV?
BAMG and IVV share 94 common holdings with a 46.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or IVV?
BAMG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.