BAMV vs VYM
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BAMV or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BAMV led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 101 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +13.24%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +16.83%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.32% | +17.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.5% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,738 | $16,661Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BAMV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMV vs VYM Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +16.83% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, BAMV is up 13.24% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +16.32% per year against +17.22% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAMV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.5% compared with 10.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $4 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.19% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
57.6% of BAMV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.8% of VYM's money is in holdings BAMV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
55 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 101 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 474 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BAMV (75.5% of the fund), and 41 for BAMV that do not appear in VYM (33.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.80% | 3.82% | 0.98% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.72% | 1.86% | 2.86% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 4.64% | 1.66% | 2.98% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.34% | 0.80% | 1.54% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 2.31% | 0.69% | 1.62% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.27% | 0.66% | 1.61% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.15% | 0.70% | 1.45% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.16% | 0.63% | 1.53% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 1.96% | 0.64% | 1.32% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 1.79% | 0.58% | 1.21% |
57.6% of BAMV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or VYM?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMV or VYM?
Over the past year BAMV returned +16.83% vs +15.34% for VYM, so BAMV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMV or VYM?
BAMV has been the more volatile fund at 11.5% annualized versus 10.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both BAMV and VYM?
BAMV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and VYM?
57.6% of BAMV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.8% of VYM's is in holdings BAMV also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or VYM?
BAMV yields 1.19% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BAMV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BAMV led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.