BAMV vs VYM
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $112M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +16.63% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.24% | +21.08% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.80% | +18.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BAMV vs VYM Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +19.24% while VYM returned +21.08%. Year to date, BAMV is up 16.63% versus a gain of 14.57% for VYM.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +17.80% per year against +18.16% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMV has the edge at +17.80% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.4% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $4 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.22% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BAMV and VYM share 52 holdings out of 650 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or VYM?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMV or VYM?
Over the past year BAMV returned +19.24% vs +21.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMV annualized +17.80% vs +6.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMV or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.4% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BAMV and VYM?
BAMV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and VYM?
BAMV and VYM share 52 common holdings with a 19.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 650 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or VYM?
BAMV yields 1.22% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.