BAMV vs VTI
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $103M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.95% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.74% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
BAMV vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +20.74% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, BAMV is up 16.95% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.4% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BAMV and VTI share 88 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or VTI?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $88 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMV or VTI?
Over the past year BAMV returned +20.74% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMV annualized +18.26% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.4% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BAMV and VTI?
BAMV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and VTI?
BAMV and VTI share 88 common holdings with a 12.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or VTI?
BAMV yields 1.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.