BAMV vs IVV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BAMV or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAMV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. BAMV is less concentrated, with 37.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 101 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.24%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +16.83%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.32% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.5%Best | 12.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,738 | $18,672Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.0%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BAMV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMV vs IVV Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +16.83% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, BAMV is up 13.24% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +16.32% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 11.5% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.19% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
87.5% of BAMV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.7% of IVV's money is in holdings BAMV also owns.
Most of BAMV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
86 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 490 in IVV, against full books of 101 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 396 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BAMV (82.0% of the fund), and 9 for BAMV that do not appear in IVV (2.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.65% | 5.69% | 2.96% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.80% | 1.44% | 3.36% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.72% | 0.66% | 4.06% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 4.64% | 0.61% | 4.03% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 2.56% | 0.27% | 2.29% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.34% | 0.32% | 2.02% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 2.31% | 0.28% | 2.03% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.27% | 0.27% | 2.00% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.16% | 0.27% | 1.89% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.15% | 0.27% | 1.88% |
87.5% of BAMV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or IVV?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $88 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMV or IVV?
Over the past year BAMV returned +16.83% vs +16.61% for IVV, so BAMV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 11.5% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BAMV and IVV?
BAMV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and IVV?
87.5% of BAMV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.7% of IVV's is in holdings BAMV also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or IVV?
BAMV yields 1.19% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BAMV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAMV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. BAMV is less concentrated, with 37.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.