BAMV vs IVV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $103M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.95% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.74% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BAMV vs IVV Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +20.74% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, BAMV is up 16.95% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.4% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.28% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BAMV and IVV share 87 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or IVV?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $88 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMV or IVV?
Over the past year BAMV returned +20.74% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMV annualized +18.26% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.4% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BAMV and IVV?
BAMV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and IVV?
BAMV and IVV share 87 common holdings with a 15.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or IVV?
BAMV yields 1.28% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.