BAMV vs VOO
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $103M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.35% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.11% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.39% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BAMV vs VOO Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +19.11% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, BAMV is up 17.35% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +18.39% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, BAMV has the edge at +18.39% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 11.4% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.28% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BAMV and VOO share 87 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or VOO?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $88 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMV or VOO?
Over the past year BAMV returned +19.11% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMV annualized +18.39% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 11.4% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BAMV and VOO?
BAMV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and VOO?
BAMV and VOO share 87 common holdings with a 14.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or VOO?
BAMV yields 1.28% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.