BAMV vs VOO
Brookstone Value Stock ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BAMV or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BAMV led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. BAMV is less concentrated, with 37.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 101 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.24%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +16.83%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.32% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.5%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,738 | $18,672Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.0%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BAMV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMV vs VOO Performance
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMV returned +16.83% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, BAMV is up 13.24% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, BAMV compounded at +16.32% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.5% for BAMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for BAMV and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMV charges 0.91% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMV currently yields 1.19% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
89.3% of BAMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 16.6% of VOO's money is in holdings BAMV also owns.
Most of BAMV is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
89 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 101 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 399 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BAMV (82.7% of the fund), and 7 for BAMV that do not appear in VOO (1.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.65% | 5.36% | 3.29% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.80% | 1.46% | 3.34% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.72% | 0.71% | 4.01% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 4.64% | 0.63% | 4.01% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 2.56% | 0.28% | 2.28% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.34% | 0.30% | 2.04% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 2.31% | 0.26% | 2.05% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.27% | 0.25% | 2.02% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.15% | 0.27% | 1.88% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.16% | 0.24% | 1.92% |
89.3% of BAMV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMV or VOO?
BAMV has an expense ratio of 0.91% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $88 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMV or VOO?
Over the past year BAMV returned +16.83% vs +16.61% for VOO, so BAMV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.5% for BAMV. Worst drawdown: BAMV -14.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both BAMV and VOO?
BAMV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMV and VOO?
89.3% of BAMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 16.6% of VOO's is in holdings BAMV also owns. They hold 89 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in BAMV and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMV or VOO?
BAMV yields 1.19% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BAMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BAMV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BAMV led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. BAMV is less concentrated, with 37.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.